![]() 09/14/2015 at 12:11 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I still don’t believe that an analog gauge couldn’t keep up with the LFA’s Yamaha V10
![]() 09/14/2015 at 12:14 |
|
I think it’s marketing bullshit.
![]() 09/14/2015 at 12:15 |
|
yeah, especially since it’s an “analog” engine. But it sounds good in marketing.
![]() 09/14/2015 at 12:15 |
|
Same here.
![]() 09/14/2015 at 12:17 |
|
Clearly
![]() 09/14/2015 at 12:19 |
|
I think it’s definitely a marketing stunt, but I also don’t think they could have used whatever typical motor they utilize in the rest of the Lexus lineup. That thing can spike from idle to 9K in less than half a second or so. That’s pretty quick. But not so quick I don’t think they couldn’t have sourced a motor to to move a physical needle that fast.
![]() 09/14/2015 at 12:30 |
|
You don’t need to have a separate motor just to spin the tach..
![]() 09/14/2015 at 12:32 |
|
I’ll be honest, I don’t know how the average dash is set up. I’m running off of assumptions here.
![]() 09/14/2015 at 12:53 |
|
I think its less “couldn’t keep up” and more “really really hard to see”. With a traditional illuminated needle there might be a persistence of image issue where the needle bouncing around the tach would make its position really hard to accurately judge (it would appear blurry), where a digital gauge with a high refresh would be clearer. however, most auto journalists aren’t scientists (shocked face) and so its easier to just say something cool like “it can’t keep up”
![]() 09/14/2015 at 13:00 |
|
Didgital stuff always seems more laggy to me.
![]() 09/14/2015 at 13:02 |
|
Maybe the mechanism driving the needle would overheat and blow out?
![]() 09/14/2015 at 13:06 |
|
So what? It’s still awesome.
![]() 09/14/2015 at 13:13 |
|
Nah it’s lies
![]() 09/14/2015 at 14:19 |
|
Stack and others make perfectly adequate electronic analog gauges that “keep up” with racing engines that have even less inertia than the LFA’s V10, so I’m sure it’s bunk. More like, “we can’t make our spiffy instruments do all the frippy stuff we want with an analog gauge, so here’s a made up story about it.”
![]() 09/14/2015 at 14:52 |
|
the cake is a lie
![]() 09/14/2015 at 16:10 |
|
I’ll still eat the cake.
![]() 09/14/2015 at 23:39 |
|
I don’t think that’s it.
If the analog would truly be keeping up with the digital, they’d be moving at the same speed. If the refresh rate is high enough they’d look identical, but the analog needle would have an infinite refresh rate.
![]() 09/14/2015 at 23:39 |
|
Yes you do. Not a V10 of course, but a little electric motor. How do
you
think it moves?
![]() 09/14/2015 at 23:57 |
|
the illumination wouldn’t though.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 05:35 |
|
Sure it would!
![]() 09/16/2015 at 17:47 |
|
It would need to stay in one spot long enough to be clearly visible to the human eye, though. I guess you’d see but a blur.
![]() 09/16/2015 at 23:01 |
|
In that case the problem is that it’s moving too fast. If you can make it move too fast, I’m sure you’ve the power to slow it down too.
![]() 09/17/2015 at 05:06 |
|
It’s all just ways of saying “we wanted the digital tachometer” anyway, but you’re of course right. They could have just increased either brightness or the needle’s width to achieve better visibility, too.
With everything that’s been said in this thread ... I’m still pretty impressed with a road-legal V engine revving from idle to the rev limiter in 0.7 seconds (if I remember that number correctly).